Menu

Draft SPGP For Member Review

The formal review period for the draft SPGP revision has closed. If you have comments you’d like to share with the Steering Committee on Admission Practices, submit them now. Any comments provided in advance of the committee’s June 11 meeting will be shared. Comments must be submitted as soon as possible to ensure they may receive a thorough review.

Please contact us with any questions.

 

Background on SPGP Revision Process

The NACAC Board of Directors last year appointed a Steering Committee on Admission Practices to examine the association’s Statement of Principles of Good Practice (SPGP). The committee was charged with modernizing the principles of the SPGP, developing content to include cohorts of students and members not adequately addressed in the current document, and ensuring the SPGP is relevant in a changing enrollment landscape.
 
The committee strived to create a document that is easy to understand and navigate, yet has the depth to promote ethical conduct and provide guidance for members to implement various admission practices. While the document is still in draft form, and reflects the feedback of several NACAC committees as well as the AP Affiliate Chairs, we have reached a phase where it is appropriate to receive additional feedback. 

Please remember this is a working draft. There are still items to be added, removed, and revised. Further, the draft you are reviewing is simply content, and does not reflect the formatting or template that will eventually be developed by the NACAC staff to display the document in a professional, attractive manner. 

The new document is organized by topic, and is no longer divided by member type. The traditional organization of All Members, Postsecondary Members, and Counseling Members, has been eliminated.  We also eliminated the categories of Mandatory; Mandatory Interpretations; and Best Practices. The entire document is now ‘mandatory’ and we’ve included interpretations in the respective sections, allowing users to have all of the content in front of them.

While this latest draft is similar in size/pages to the current SPGP, we actually eliminated a good deal of text. We condensed or eliminated some content in the mandatory/interpretations sections, and eliminated most of Best Practices. Some Best Practices are now ‘mandatory’ and others will be assembled into a separate educational document by another NACAC committee.  

The reason the number of pages remained similar is that we added quite a bit of content to modernize the document and to include cohorts/topics that weren’t represented previously. We added significant text to include transfer students, aligning with NACAC’s strategic plan, as well as content to address international students, members, and related practices. In addition, we have brought greater clarity to the use of commissioned agents in recruiting international students. Finally, we added content to cover topics like mid-year admission, and wait list management - items that were either absent from the current SPGP, or only previously addressed in Best Practices.   

The SPGP is now divided into two main sections – our core ethical principles, followed by the chief practices that drive our work. In essence, we have a code of ethics, and a code of practices. Each section contains a grey box, outlined in blue, that represents the core statement and overarching values of each respective topic. All of the rules/principles/interpretations follow directly below these core statements.

Expand / Collapse All