Each year, several thousand undocumented students graduate high school, many of whom have lived in the United States since childhood. Following the 1982 Supreme Court decision in Plyer v. Doe, it has been the law of the land that public elementary and secondary schools must provide a free and appropriate education to all children, regardless of their legal status.
NACAC believes that making higher education accessible to these individuals is the right thing to do -- from both humanitarian and economic perspectives. Higher education has been linked to healthier, happier lives and increased civic participation. From a fiscal outlook, investing in higher education results in strong economic returns, for individuals and also for society. Median earnings for bachelor's degree holders are 64% higher than those for high school graduates, and college graduates typically pay 134% more in federal income taxes than non-degree holders.
Tuition equity policies adopted by some states allow certain undocumented students to pay in-state tuition rates at the state's public colleges and universities. Generally, these students must have lived in the state for a certain amount of time and have graduated from an in-state high school. Because undocumented students are ineligible to receive federal student aid, and because they frequently come from low-income backgrounds, out-of-state tuition rates can put higher education firmly out of reach for undocumented students. Thus, tuition equity is an important step in helping these students afford college. Some states have gone one step further by granting undocumented students access to state financial aid. Unfortunately, some states have taken the opposite route by severely limiting undocumented students' abilities to enroll in public higher education, or have introduced proposals to roll back existing tuition equity policies.
On June 15, 2012, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that it would not deport certain undocumented youth who came to the United States as children. Under a directive from the DHS secretary, these youth may be granted a type of temporary permission to stay in the U.S. called “deferred action.” The Obama administration called this program Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA.
The Trump Administration announced on September 5, 2017 that it would rescind the memo establishing DACA. NACAC opposed this decision. In June 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump Administration did not follow the proper procedures for ending the program; it did not rule on the lawfulness of ending the program. Consequently, DACA recipients no longer face the prospect of deportation. DHS continues to process renewal applications for individuals who have previously received protection under DACA. The Administration has said that it will reject all new applications while it conducts a review of the program. In addition, the Administration may take additional steps to end the program and the DACA program faces other legal challenges. Its future remains uncertain.
For more information on the current state of DACA, check out the resources below.
NACAC supports the following policies to make higher education more affordable for undocumented students:
• Enactment of a federal The Dream and Promise Act (116th Congress) or similar legislation
• Tuition equity policies that allow undocumented students to pay resident tuition rates at public colleges and universities
• State and federal policies to make need-based financial aid available to undocumented students
Expand / Collapse All
NACAC Knowledge Center
Explore additional resources for professionals working with undocumented students.Learn More
State Laws & Policies on Access to Higher Education
This map of the United States from the National Immigration Law Center illustrates the range of state policies that either provide or restrict access to in-state tuition and/or state financial aid for immigrant students.Learn More
Litigation Related to the DACA Program
More than ten cases have been filed challenging the Trump administration’s termination of the DACA program. Learn more about the status of these legal challenges from the National Immigration Law Center.Learn More